Draft library

Posts and comments before review

Each draft keeps its intent, disclosure note, link policy, risk flags, edit suggestions, and readiness status in one place.

readyr/webdev

How I scope AI-generated code changes so the diff stays reviewable

I have been testing a rule for AI coding workflows: the output is not done until a human can review the diff in one sitting. The practical version is small surface area, explicit success checks, and no speculative refactors. For people using AI coding tools, what makes a generated change easiest for you to trust?

Disclosure: I am building in this space, so I am looking for workflow feedback rather than clicks.

Rule status

Ready for human review

0 checks need attention

Edit suggestions

  • Keep product name out of the first post.
  • Ask for workflow examples, not signups.
reviewedr/SaaS

What makes a landing page critique actually useful?

I keep seeing first landing pages fail for the same reason: the copy describes the product instead of the buyer's moment of need. When you ask for critique, what feedback format helps most: headline first, offer clarity, proof, pricing, or something else?

Disclosure: I work on landing page tooling, so I will avoid linking unless someone asks.

Rule status

Needs rewrite before queue

2 checks need attention

Edit suggestions

  • Avoid saying the tool solves the problem.
  • Ask community members to share examples.
draftedr/smallbusiness

Do you track leads in a spreadsheet, notes app, CRM, or something else?

For small service businesses, the messy middle between memory and a full CRM seems under-discussed. If you run a local business, what do you use to remember follow-ups, quotes, and customers who said to check back later?

Disclosure: I am researching this workflow for software, but I am not asking anyone to try it here.

Rule status

Ready for human review

0 checks need attention

Edit suggestions

  • Keep language non-technical.
  • Do not frame the problem as a software pitch.