Pain Miner
Turn Reddit-style discussions into monetizable pains
Manually record complaints, alternatives, intent, and evidence. No scraping, no hidden collection.
Pain Miner 是什么
这个页面不是让你复制 Reddit 内容，而是把用户抱怨整理成可验证的商业痛点。
为什么和收入有关
高频、强烈、有付费意愿的痛点，才值得继续做 offer、内容和服务包。
下一步做什么
先录入真实公开讨论或客户访谈，再按 frequency 和 willingness to pay 过滤。
常见错误
- 不要把一个高赞帖子当成市场证明。
- 不要复制用户内容去发布。
- 不要忽略当前替代方案和付费意愿。
AI-generated diffs are too broad to review confidently.
The code usually runs, but I spend more time figuring out why it changed five files than I would have spent writing the fix.
Founders need a critique framework that turns comments into testable changes.
I can get ten comments, but I still do not know which one actually helps conversion.
Local service owners lose follow-up context across lightweight tools.
I have notes, texts, and a spreadsheet. The follow-up is always in one of them, just not when I need it.
Makers need to turn launch posts into problem-led discussion prompts.
I keep posting the product, but the useful replies only show up when I ask about the problem.
Add manual pain signal
Add a thread title and pain summary before saving.
Clusters
Reviewable AI work
Builders want AI output small enough to understand, review, and trust.
Paid audit or prompt pack before SaaS automation.
Critique to action
Founders receive feedback but struggle to prioritize it into a test.
$49 scan, then $199 launch plan.
Follow-up memory
Local operators need lightweight follow-up memory before a CRM is worth it.
Service-first workflow audit, then simple workspace.